Evaluation & Review Process

• All papers will be subjected to double-blind peer-reviews and are expected to meet the scientific criteria of novelty and academic excellence.
• Relevancy, structure, research method, ethical conducts, language standard, innovativeness, references, hypothesis, result presentation, proficiency, format, amongst many other factors are considered for the evaluation process.
• The submitting author is responsible for ensuring that the article’s publication has been approved by all other co-authors and takes responsibility for the paper during submission and peer review.
• The publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation.
• Papers that are accepted will be published in the Conference Proceedings.

Instructions for the Oral Presentation

The length of the presentation should be around 15 minutes. You can use any form of presentations you wish; we provide you with the necessary equipment upon request. Make sure you attend the conference a bit earlier to prepare the props.